 |
Sign up for our Newsletter
Free with Sign-up

Popular categories
Categories
ARCHIVE SUMMARY
View by Date
ARCHIVES
November, 2008
October, 2008
September, 2008
August, 2008
July, 2008
June, 2008
May, 2008
April, 2008
March, 2008
February, 2008
January, 2008
December, 2007
November, 2007
October, 2007
September, 2007
August, 2007
July, 2007
June, 2007
May, 2007
April, 2007
March, 2007
February, 2007
January, 2007
December, 2006
November, 2006
October, 2006
September, 2006
August, 2006
July, 2006
June, 2006
May, 2006
April, 2006
March, 2006
February, 2006
January, 2006
December, 2005
November, 2005
October, 2005
September, 2005
August, 2005
July, 2005
June, 2005
May, 2005
April, 2005
March, 2005
February, 2005
January, 2005
December, 2004
November, 2004
October, 2004
Subscribe
|
|
 |  |
|
 |
 |
TODAY'S FINDS |
|
Mon Aug 18, 2008
Apparently FitFlops Are Not At The Top Of Everyone’s List
Category: Fashion Rant and Rave
Although they were named one of Oprah's favorite things for summer, FitFlops got less than a stellar review in yesterday's NY Times TMagazine. Writer Alex Kuczynski took issue with both their appearance and their failure to produce rock hard glutes, claiming the only things she gained were "a funny tan on my feet and an unrelated searing pain in my right foot." Well, SheFinds had a slightly different experience with FitFlops when we reviewed them back in May. Granted, our butts didn't end up tight enough to bounce a quarter off of just by walking around for an afternoon, but the burn was definitely felt. So we ask our readers -- Have you tried FitFlops? If so, have you noticed a difference in the muscle definition of your legs, or is this just another gimmick? Sound off in our comments section below.
Posted by:
on Aug 18, 08 - 4:00 pm | Profile
Page 1 of 1 pages
Sponsored Post
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|